London Power ad

Search the Forum

(Advanced Search)

  SOMA 84
Posted by: sinusoids - Today, 12:05 AM - Forum: TUT Q&A - Replies (2)

Why is the input jack not insulated from the chassis? 

What is the 270R from the OPT 16 Ohm tap to ground on the schematic, is it on the wiring layout?  Gathering parts for this.

Print this item

  Fixed to Cathode Bias switching problems...
Posted by: liquidair - 08-16-2019, 12:37 AM - Forum: TUT Q&A - Replies (5)

So I built an amp with a fixed/cathode bias switch like that for the Standard project in TUT5. The only difference was that I used a relay in place of the switch and a cap across the cathode resistor, but I've had some problems.

While testing without tubes, I found that in cathode bias mode, 1/2 of whatever the bias voltage was set to showed up at pin 5 of the tubes...fixed bias was fine. Simulations confirmed this behavior, and I found that changing the 2x 30k1 resistors around Q10 to 331k (c-b) and 2.21k (b-sw) ensured the bias didn't leak through anymore. Is that normal?

The second thing is the relay keeps sticking after a couple of switches. I assume this is the contacts welding from the cap discharging when the relay shorts it. Oddly, when I unsolder it and activate it out of circuit with a battery, it no longer remains stuck and works again. This relay looks heftier than the PA66-CR ones, so I expected it to be fine. Is there a way to stop this from happening like soldering a cap across the contacts to take the initial discharge or something?

My solution for now was to just get rid of the cap, but the problem is testing with a sine wave was putting 10W into that resistor (470R 7W). The ones in TUT5 are all 5W, and I realize that a constant sine wave is not like actual playing, but is this a big enough resistor? I'm going to assume that with the cap, all we need to worry about is more or less the idle power...any AC will go through the cap?

Thank you all!

Print this item

  Schematic management
Posted by: K O'Connor - 08-06-2019, 07:50 PM - Forum: PCB Design - Replies (4)

Hi Guys


When we draw a schematic by hand we are limited by the paper size as to how much circuitry we can comfortably fit onto the page. Symbols and text have to be large enough to read clearly, preferably without the need for a magnifying glass. Hand rendering usually invokes our sense of proportion and we try to keep similar symbols the same size as each other, and try to have room for what needs to be shown. We try to organise the circuit flow so it easy to follow and often use connection symbols such as GND and V+ to show things that are tied to each other without having to pull a line all the way across the page.

With computer software, and PCB design programs like Eagle, schematic entry is much the same as hand rendering except that we go to a library within the program to find symbols, then 'drop' them in place. Then we connect them with 'nets'. As we add more components we run out of space as far as the scale of our view goes, because Eagle defaults to a certain effective page size. We can zoom out and add more parts then use the 'fit' function to resize the circuit to the screen size. Things are smaller now, but likely with modern monitor sizes we can still read component names and values. However, it is very easy to get to a point where you have to begin zooming in to read text, and that becomes a problem if you ever want to print out the schematic.

In drafting, there are standard size "sheets", or paper sizes. 'A' is the same size as a North American letter size, 8.5" x 11". The orientation can be long-side vertical (portrait) or long-side horizontal (landscape). Size 'B' is twice the area; 'C' is four times; 'D' is eight times and 'E' is sixteen times. Obviously, for hobbyists and home users, printing anything other than 'A' size is impossible  Yes, there is 'legal' size paper and in Europe size A4 is slightly larger than letter size.

Eagle provides a facility to have multiple sheets for the schematic. This allows you to break the circuit into smaller portions that can be printed more easily and more legibly. When we need to make a connection tie from one sheet to another, we use "ports" or "wire links". These are DEVICES in the Eagle library that let you have these page breaks yet on the board the same-labelled ports are tied together by a trace.

Print this item

  New kid
Posted by: FormyxAmps - 05-21-2019, 05:26 PM - Forum: New Member Introductions - No Replies

Hi all,

I am a 40-yr-old youngster who builds tube amps and repairs/renovates instrument and Hi-Fi amps. Started reading the TUT series and building amps as a hobby, aside from guitar playing with our band, at around 2007-8.

After messing around, building, repairing and reading trying to figure out how stuff work, I decided that life is not worth it if you don't do what you love, so last year I decided to give it a go and launched my small company in Stockholm, SE in the hope that someday I won't have to be employed at my boring day job any more...

Very glad to be here in the forum with you all! Hope to contribute however I can! Smile


Print this item

  Question about Applying SUS-2 to See-saw Inverter
Posted by: makinrose - 05-05-2019, 01:19 AM - Forum: Sag & Sustain - Replies (6)

I'm working on designing a new amp.  I've used SUS kits before and really like them but have question: When applying the SUS-2 kit to cathode bias amp with the "Old Style" See-saw Inverter is it okay to lift the grid-leak connections to ground even though one of the triodes is sending signal to the other?  Will this affect the operation of the phase inverter?  Here's link to style of inverter:  Huh

Print this item

Video Londonpower PSU-20L, BFX, L-Pre, Z-Pre, Line-Out Pre amplifier
Posted by: peteotto - 04-26-2019, 09:50 PM - Forum: Personal Projects - No Replies

Print this item

  Heat management with Power Scaling??
Posted by: makinrose - 04-02-2019, 08:06 PM - Forum: Power Scaling - Replies (1)

With Power Scaling when is additional heat sinking and/or a fan necessary? Is there a certain temperature at which one should worry? I'm guessing chassis up in the cabinet designs are more problematic that the typical Marshall configuration.

Print this item

  New PSU kits +/-12V
Posted by: K O'Connor - 03-15-2019, 05:19 PM - Forum: London Power Kits & Mods - No Replies

Hi Guys

We have two new power supply kits to support low-voltage circuitry, such as for switching and opamps. The kits provide symmetric voltage outputs aka "split rails" of +/-12Vdc at two different power levels.

PM12-6 provides +/-12V at 175mA

PM12-12 provides +/-12V at 350mA.

PM12 has universal mains fusing, and uses Hammond semi-toroidal PTs, metal-film resistrs, and 10,000-hour caps.

Print this item

  Reverb Feedback Issues SOLVED
Posted by: makinrose - 03-12-2019, 12:07 AM - Forum: Personal Projects - Replies (9)

I've been having problem with new build. It's essentially a Deluxe Reverb Combo but with some added decoupling and improved grounding. The issue I'm having is with the reverb tank.  Outside of the combo the reverb is quiet and operates as it should. When placed inside the combo the reverb starts to feedback building into loud howling.  Moving the tank around, flipping is orientation,  and padding the reverb bag really hasn't helped at all. I've tried a few different tanks and am at my wits end about what I'm doing wrong.  Huh  Any ideas?  Thanks for everyone's help!

Print this item

  ToT + Resonance
Posted by: sinusoids - 03-10-2019, 08:48 PM - Forum: TUT Q&A - Replies (8)

I'm now in the planning stages of building a new amp head from scratch.  Plenty of chassis room to work with.  This will be my first LPSP,  I am looking forward to that.  Plan now is the to build the power supply, PA and preamp from ToT but with eyelet cards. 

"thunderous smooth" described in TUT caught my attention - I do not like bright tones or hard distortion.  Would the Active resonance presence circuit, fig 6-34 of TUT, work well in the ToT PA?  I'd use both 12AX7 tubes in the EQ network shown.  Would it work following C1 of the PA, fig 6-2 of ToT, with an added coupling cap?  0.47u?  Would a a larger OPT be a little smoother than the 1608 in the circuit?  I have a single 6lb 6.6k OPT that I could use.  6V6, 5881, 6Pi3C-E and 6L6 all are to be tried.  I will add a triode/pentode switch.  I plan to use the bias supply as described in ToT . 

I want to lay out the circuit cards and build this up from scratch.   I mostly play rhythm, the other guitarist I play with has a bright setup and I try to keep things lower (tone wise) and slightly clean to over-driven.  P-90s are on the guitar.

Thanks for any input from anyone, anywhere here.

Print this item

Come in where it's warm!
A warm welcome to those interested in tube and hi-fi audio! Fans of Kevin O'Connor's The Ultimate Tone (TUT) book series form a part of our population. Kevin O'Connor is the creator of the popular Power Scaling methodology for amplifiers.
Please remember these three principles: respect, sharing, community.
Not familiar with The Ultimate Tone book series? See discussion topics, or click here to visit London Power/Power Press Publishing.

Forum Hosted by London Power
London Power logo