Hi Guys
The
London Power site has a "
Power Scaling Q&A" as well as detailed descriptions of the kits and selection guides "
Selecting a Power Scaling Kit" and "
About our Power Scaling Kits".
London Power invented
Power Scaling, so our method is the correct one to use if you want cranked amp sounds at Human Scale Loudness. It's not just hyperbole - it works!
To maintain the sound of the amp you have to do two things: keep the speaker-amp interface intact, and maintain the transfer function of the amp. The first part is easy - just leave the speaker connected to the amp. This means that using a speaker attenuator is problematic as they interfere with how the speaker and amplifier interact. Everyone who has used an attenuator also knows that the tone changes quite a lot when you get down to useful loudness reductions.
The second condition sounds complex but it is not. When
Power Scaling (PS) is installed correctly the tone of the amp is maintained as you dial the controls down. The only thing you lose is that the aural compression of your own hearing is no longer being invoked to change your perception of the sound. Because the intent is to maintain the transfer function (input versus output), bias and other internal parameters are all addressed and taken care of.
VVR is a bastardised copy and wrong implementation of a part of the Classic-PS circuit. Dana Hall was asked by a
licensed Power Scale amp builder to design a PCB, at which time Dana could see the entire implementation, yet his version can only be applied to small amps and cannot dial down to truly quiet levels. The crippled application also requires bandaids in the form of extra capacitors being added to the amp to keep controls from becoming scratchy - including the guitar volume pot!
Marshall's EPA used in the YJ and Slash models is a form of PS-TT (two-thirds Power Scaling), but a poor implementation. Techs who have bypassed the EPA find the amp sounds like a Marshall again, and if they modify the EPA per our standards the amp remains Marshally-sounding but has useful power reduction.
Victor Mason of Mojave Amps did not understand the circuit of the Power Scale kit he bought, and copied the Mesa Limit control depicted in
TUT. He used our
Power Scale ad copy to describe what his control would do - which it does not - and stated "Kevin O'Connor likes complicated circuits". That is not true. A circuit must be as Einstein describes, "Simple enough to do the job properly and no simpler".
Power Scaling does what we say it does and the alternatives simply do not.
As our books
TUT2,
TUT4 and
TUT6 show, there are a wide variety of circuits that can be used to implement
Power Scaling, each with its own benefits and cost.